Thorsten,
Thank you again. Your reply gives me a little perspective on what you were changing between versions. Wish I had more time to delve into this code, but company demands are much more pressing.
I will look into the issue with PHP, first, to see if PHP 5.2 is viable (honestly would like to ...
Search found 3 matches
- Mon Sep 21, 2009 5:34 pm
- Forum: Proposals
- Topic: Reconsider the quick phasing out of older versions
- Replies: 5
- Views: 11533
- Mon Sep 21, 2009 1:36 pm
- Forum: Proposals
- Topic: Reconsider the quick phasing out of older versions
- Replies: 5
- Views: 11533
Re: Reconsider the quick phasing out of older versions
Thorsten,
Thank you for your reply. I understand where you're coming from in terms of support so its understandable that older versions cannot persist forever.
With the roadmap, I was concerned that our data was locked into a certain format based on the database support. Between versions (2.0.x ...
Thank you for your reply. I understand where you're coming from in terms of support so its understandable that older versions cannot persist forever.
With the roadmap, I was concerned that our data was locked into a certain format based on the database support. Between versions (2.0.x ...
- Fri Sep 18, 2009 8:50 pm
- Forum: Proposals
- Topic: Reconsider the quick phasing out of older versions
- Replies: 5
- Views: 11533
Reconsider the quick phasing out of older versions
Hi,
We use phpMyFaq as an internal FAQ system in the company I work for. The server that it runs on is a CentOS 5 box with PHP 5.1.6 on it. As another user requested awhile back, 5.1.6 is the version that CentOS (and presumably the equivalent RedHat Enterprise version) has stuck with, regardless of ...
We use phpMyFaq as an internal FAQ system in the company I work for. The server that it runs on is a CentOS 5 box with PHP 5.1.6 on it. As another user requested awhile back, 5.1.6 is the version that CentOS (and presumably the equivalent RedHat Enterprise version) has stuck with, regardless of ...