Search found 9 matches
- Wed Dec 03, 2014 9:04 pm
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Access controlled FAQs not shown as popular/latest
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3587
Re: Access controlled FAQs not shown as popular/latest
I figured it out, I had a user control set as well, which cause the following line to reject the row: Faq.php L1896 if (!in_array($row->user_id, array(-1, $this->user)) || !in_array($row->group_id, $this->groups)) So the !in_array($row->user_id, array(-1, $this->user)) was causing the reject. I turn...
- Wed Dec 03, 2014 6:32 pm
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Access controlled FAQs not shown as popular/latest
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3587
Re: Access controlled FAQs not shown as popular/latest
2.8.15
My user can view the access controlled FAQ when showing the category, but the "Most popular FAQs" and "Latest FAQs" do not show it.
My user can view the access controlled FAQ when showing the category, but the "Most popular FAQs" and "Latest FAQs" do not show it.
- Wed Dec 03, 2014 2:00 am
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Access controlled FAQs not shown as popular/latest
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3587
Access controlled FAQs not shown as popular/latest
I'm using access controls on my FAQs to limit who can view them. However, I'm noticing when I set access controls the FAQ no longer shows in the "Most popular FAQs" and "Latest FAQs" listings. I would like access controlled FAQs to show in these categories, assuming the user has ...
- Wed Dec 03, 2014 12:38 am
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Remove sign up option
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3699
Re: Remove sign up option
+1 for an option to disable sign up. I'm running a LDAP backed FAQ and do not want local accounts.
https://github.com/thorsten/phpMyFAQ/issues/944
https://github.com/thorsten/phpMyFAQ/issues/944
- Mon Oct 27, 2014 9:07 pm
- Forum: General discussions
- Topic: Shared storage for load balancing
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1668
Shared storage for load balancing
I want to load balance my PhpMyFaq install for redundancy. Per the installer the app needs write access to: attachments/ data/ images/ I plan to set up shared storage under the app for attachments. Are these 3 directories all that I need to share? The configs and code itself will be handled independ...
- Mon Oct 27, 2014 8:13 pm
- Forum: Bug reports
- Topic: 2.8 brach HEAD stable?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7261
Re: 2.8 brach HEAD stable?
Aah, so there is more to a release than just bundling up the code in git, I didn't read the documentation throughly enough. When I try and run Grunt, though, I'm getting a file not found error: Running "less:development" (less) task >> FileError: '../../../../vendor/fontawesome/build/asset...
- Fri Oct 24, 2014 10:39 pm
- Forum: Bug reports
- Topic: 2.8 brach HEAD stable?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7261
2.8 brach HEAD stable?
I downloaded 2.8 branch HEAD (4356da3132) to try and get latest patches. It returned a 200 but didn't render any HTML. Is it stable? $ curl http://127.0.0.1:1080 -ILXGET HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 21:38:36 GMT Server: Apache/2.2.15 (CentOS) X-Powered-By: PHP/5.4.32 Content-Length: 0 Conn...
- Fri Oct 24, 2014 10:29 pm
- Forum: Bug reports
- Topic: Unable to activate FAQ in 2.8.15
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3453
Unable to activate FAQ in 2.8.15
On a fresh install of 2.8.15 I am unable to activate FAQs. When checking the checkbox under 'Edit Existing FAQs' the admin worklog displays 'The changes were saved successfully.', however the changes do not take effect. Similar behavior was seen on delete which was fixed by applying eeda931 as a pat...
- Thu Oct 23, 2014 4:44 pm
- Forum: Bug reports
- Topic: Delete Button not working
- Replies: 6
- Views: 6082
Re: Delete Button not working
I'm also seeing that the 'Active' checkbox does not take effect.
I'm evaluating this for use my my team and cannot wait until the next release. Is there a previous release where this functionality is known working? Do we know when the functionality regressed?
I'm evaluating this for use my my team and cannot wait until the next release. Is there a previous release where this functionality is known working? Do we know when the functionality regressed?