<body>
<p>The following is a comparison table of the various popular
DC++ clients and others that use the Direct Connect protocol.
You can see from the columns of features, how the clients differ from
the original DC++ and other modded clients. If you would like
your client added, send me a PM and I'll consider adding it.
The table is a work in progress, suggestions are welcome.</p>
<p><b><font size="4">Windows Based Clients - </font><font
size="2">Updated: 1/2/2006</font></b></p>
<p><font size="4"><b>DC++ Based Clients</b></font></p>
<table id="table1" border="1" cellpadding="0"
cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th height="48" width="112"><b><font
size="1">Client Name</font></b></th>
<th height="48" width="51"><font size="1">DC++
ver / Client ver</font></th>
<th align="center" height="48" width="31"><font
size="1">Rich Text Color</font></th>
<th align="center" height="48" width="58"><font
size="1">Segment Downloading</font></th>
<th align="center" height="48" width="53"><font
size="1">Upload Lim/ Disc Slow Speed</font></th>
<th align="center" height="48" width="71"><font
size="1">IP / Lock / PK / Supports Info</font></th>
<th height="48" width="77"><font size="1">Client
type string generator</font></th>
<th align="center" height="48" width="58"><font
size="1">Player Integration</font></th>
<th align="center" height="48" width="48"><font
size="1">Share Checking</font></th>
<th align="center" height="48" width="94"><font
size="1">Other Features</font></th>
</tr>
I tried as much as I know but I'va found no fix. It works in Firefox 1.5 and Opera 8.51 and with IE6 and full screen resolution (1280x1024) on my system...
I have a css difference I can't seem to pin down. IE7 is showing everything properly - but in Firefox, one page is justified to the top while the other(s) are spaced down a little.
Any ideas where I can modify code to make this consistent - justified up to the top?
Also - can't figure out how to make the header search button in the phpMyFaq section (News & FAQs) the same as the default button throughout the rest of the site... not a big deal, but if it's an easy answer - I'm all ears!
Yes, I've carved things up a bit to suit my project - do you think I could have achieved the same result(s) in a less damaging way to the original code structure?
Guess I better update last week's release before I get to much farther.. that's been the main reason I fell behind in updates a couple years back. Hopefully the 2.0 version will make template variables easier to update.
Thanks for making this script available for others to learn and enjoy. It's the nicest FAQ I've seen, even compared to talented programmers creating for Joomla, etc.
Holgate wrote:Yes, I've carved things up a bit to suit my project - do you think I could have achieved the same result(s) in a less damaging way to the original code structure?
you cannot compare a table-based layout with an CSS based layout.